[members-discuss] IETF funding
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] IETF funding
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] IETF funding
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Thu May 26 09:24:04 CEST 2016
Hi, On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 12:41:36AM +0200, Peter Koch wrote: > On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 05:31:41PM +0200, Sander Steffann wrote: > > > As requested by Nigel Titley at the NCC Services working group session, I would like to express my support for the RIPE NCC to participate in the long-term funding to the IETF. > > I think it is easy to agree with the general principle, however I was not impressed > by today's presentation because it did not provide relevant information in addition > (nor in response) to the discussion at the previous GM. What Peter says. Supporting the IETF is good, with a yearly contribution to ISOC or IETF directly. Transferring our reserves to their reserves, I fail to see the compelling reason why this would be in our (RIPE) interest. Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20160526/67273f56/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] IETF funding
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] IETF funding
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]