This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] [Polycomm] (TS-221) [ncc-announce] [news] RIPE NCC Members and Multiple LIR Accounts - Please Discuss
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [news] RIPE NCC Members and Multiple LIR Accounts - Please Discuss
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] About unsubscribing
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Matthias Šubik
matthias.subik at ucnd.at
Thu Feb 18 14:40:41 CET 2016
Interesting ... > On 17.02.2016, at 21:29, Anthony Somerset <anthony.somerset at cloudunboxed.net> wrote: > > to come back to the debate about multiple LIR’s and ip space, let me play devil’s advocate for a second :) > > why don’t we want to allow final IPv4 space to be consumed as quickly as reasonably possible reserving only some final space as required for critical infrastructure needs? (critical infrastructure might be considered as things like as internet exchange points or verified root DNS servers etc) we can have that cheaper, and reversible: Instruct RIPE NCC to stop allocating any IPv4. Or only after gaining support of at least 10 members :) On the other hand the insane price might be sustainable for some networks, and make anything impossible for others. Matthias
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [news] RIPE NCC Members and Multiple LIR Accounts - Please Discuss
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] About unsubscribing
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]