[members-discuss] [comms] [ncc-announce] [news] RIPE NCC Members and Multiple
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [comms] [ncc-announce] [news] RIPE NCC Members and Multiple
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [comms] [ncc-announce] [news] RIPE NCC Members and Multiple
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jérôme Nicolle
jerome at ceriz.fr
Thu Feb 18 00:45:47 CET 2016
Hi Niels, Le 17/02/2016 16:17, Kampen, Niels van a écrit : > Could be as easy as making the initial /22 of a LIR non-transferable? This is one of the smartest things i've read all day, thank you for that. I do agree that the initial /22 assigned to a new LIR should not be allowed for transfer, no matter the context (merge ?). We'll all be better off if the acquisition of a new /22 to be re-integrated into an existing LIR's pool should be more expensive thanit's facial market value. So let's forbid new LIRs from transfer before, well, at least 5 years, that should help with regulating this mess. Best regards, -- Jérôme Nicolle +33 6 19 31 27 14
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [comms] [ncc-announce] [news] RIPE NCC Members and Multiple
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [comms] [ncc-announce] [news] RIPE NCC Members and Multiple
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]