[members-discuss] [comms] [ncc-announce] [news] RIPE NCC Members and Multiple
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [comms] [ncc-announce] [news] RIPE NCC Members and Multiple
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [comms] [ncc-announce] [news] RIPE NCC Members and Multiple
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
MikroVPS
info at mikrovps.hu
Wed Feb 17 19:51:51 CET 2016
In this analogy RIPE need to handle that. I think not a good think if old/big telcos/ISP's are holding many ipv4 address, because they can. This also not helping to incraise IPv6 penetration, especially for end users (costumer internet connections, etc). (by the way, also i don't think it is normal, some old organisation/companys in US holding /8, because back in the '90's when they received ipv4 exhausing doesnt matter) *Köszönettel:* Csárdi-Braunstein János *Email:* info at mikrovps.hu *Telefon:* +3694200210 [image: facebook] <https://www.facebook.com/Mikrovps> [image: twitter] <https://twitter.com/MikroVPS> [image: google plus] <https://plus.google.com/+MikrovpsHu> [image: linkedin] <https://www.linkedin.com/company/mikrovps> 2016-02-17 19:37 GMT+01:00 Thomas Mangin <thomas.mangin at exa-networks.co.uk>: > On 17 Feb 2016, at 17:17, MikroVPS wrote: > > I think IP addresses as like radio frequencies (spectrum), it's limited. >> You can't own/hold frequencies without using that, you need to give back to >> national organisation what manages that, to allocate new companies, and you >> can't sell that also. Why RIPE/ARIN/etc can't do this with IPv4 addresses? >> I not really see the difference. >> > > I can understand your line of thought but this analogy does not work. > Governments can impose laws on their businesses, the RIPE NCC can not. > Also most frequencies are SOLD at GREAT VALUE to Telcos - funding > governments - when thanks to the RIPE NCC model, IPs are nearly free. > > So unless you are suggesting that IP address management should be governed > by the ITU - and I for one does not - the RIPE NCC can only bind LIR by > contractual laws .. and trying to enforce it internationally would sure be > painful to watch. > > Thomas > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20160217/6ec4fed6/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [comms] [ncc-announce] [news] RIPE NCC Members and Multiple
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [comms] [ncc-announce] [news] RIPE NCC Members and Multiple
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]