[members-discuss] [comms] [ncc-announce] [news] RIPE NCC Members and Multiple
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [comms] [ncc-announce] [news] RIPE NCC Members and Multiple
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [comms] [ncc-announce] [news] RIPE NCC Members and Multiple
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Matthias Šubik
matthias.subik at ucnd.at
Tue Feb 16 16:23:20 CET 2016
> On 16.02.2016, at 16:21, Nick Hilliard <nick at netability.ie> wrote: > > Misak Khachatryan wrote: >> Why not to have a some rule to forbid IPv4 transfer from last /8 RIPE >> block for 3 or even 5 years? This will prevent companies to register >> LIR just for selling addresses. >> >> This of course is very strict, but some restriction like this can help. > > this sort of thing won't help. Transfers will happen anyway. The only > thing that will happen as a result of attempting to ban transfers is > that the transfer will not be documented, which will drive the address > market underground. This benefits no-one. When you look at my idea posted earlier, like you I won’t interfere with the usage, just the bill is higher from a business perspective. Matthias
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [comms] [ncc-announce] [news] RIPE NCC Members and Multiple
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [comms] [ncc-announce] [news] RIPE NCC Members and Multiple
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]