[members-discuss] [comms] [ncc-announce] [news] RIPE NCC Members and Multiple
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [comms] [ncc-announce] [news] RIPE NCC Members and Multiple
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [comms] [ncc-announce] [news] RIPE NCC Members and Multiple
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Max Tulyev
maxtul at netassist.ua
Tue Feb 16 16:02:19 CET 2016
On 16.02.16 14:46, Thomas Mangin wrote: > 1. Is the activity of members opening additional LIR accounts a > problem that must be prevented? > > It is. The RIPE NCC policies should be written in a way which is > beneficial to its community. It is NOT. The problem is not a secondary LIR account itself, but an additional /22 allocated to same company. So quick way is to change policy and say every *COMPANY* should receive one /22, not every *LIR*. P.S. By the way, if there are several LIR accounts binded to one company, how many votes do that company have at General Meeting?
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [comms] [ncc-announce] [news] RIPE NCC Members and Multiple
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [comms] [ncc-announce] [news] RIPE NCC Members and Multiple
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]