[members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [news] RIPE NCC Members and Multiple LIR Accounts - Please Discuss

Hi,
> On 11.02.2016, at 16:36, Pavel Odintsov <odintsov at fastvps.ru> wrote:
> 
> So I have yet another advice.
> 
> I like idea to pay some taxes for each transferred subnet.  If you move /16 you should "pay" /20 to public RIPE's pool. What about this? 
interesting.
This would work for a while, but all ideas fail on the fact when I start renting out IPs to another LIR, they could even be reflected in the RIPE-DB, but still come out of another LIR.

When you really want to get v6 going, you should make v6 a requirement to use the RIPE-DB :) 
Then at least the network admins get dual stacked, and will notice if they are v6-offline (as described recently in the “decreasing v6-RIPEness report”. 

I would even go so far, to ask the registries to require v6 DNS-Servers, and ask the regulation in telecommunication (or the EU) to require v6-MX and web servers (when listed in public).

Then the need for v4 address space is dampened down.

Matthias



-- 
UCND United City Network Development GmbH
Ungargasse 58/13
1030 Wien, Österreich

FN 188089b beim Handelsgericht Wien
UID ATU 54974906

Mag. Matthias Šubik
Hotline: +43 780 363636
Mobil.: +43 676 83820-787