This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [news] RIPE NCC Members and Multiple LIR Accounts
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [news] RIPE NCC Members and Multiple LIR Accounts
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [news] RIPE NCC Members and Multiple LIR Accounts
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Tim
tim at treestle.com
Fri Feb 12 14:52:17 CET 2016
I'm for opening the market up further, with inter-RIR sales between LIRs which (correct me if I'm wrong) is only possible currently with legacy resources through third-party IP brokers. If you want to reduce the price, increase the availability in through an open market. Over Regulation of inter-LIR sales will create a shortage. -Tim Note: I need more IP space, so it's not like I want to have to buy them, I'd love it if I could just claim more for free from RIPE, but that just isn't viable or fair. On 12/02/2016 14:43, Daniel Stolpe wrote: > > Oh my. I would like to think that in Poland you were done with > socialist economy. In Sweden we do have some tendencies in that > direction, most obvious when it comes to rental flats. And well, it > was not originally a socialist idea but a temporary rule during World > War II, just that nobody realised the war ended + 70 years ago. > > So what we have is regulated prices on rental flats. As a result there > is no money in building new houses and thus a shortage. If you want to > rent a flat you have to wait for 10-20 years. And because of the > shortage a rental contract has a "value" that you don't want to give > up. So we have a shortage *and* empty flats. And even though you are > not allowed to sell the contracts people still do (pretending to swap > flats, which is legal). > > In short - the idea might sound nice but it does not work. If holders > of unused IPv4 space are allowed to sell addresses on an open market, > chances are much bigger it will be used. If not, the holder will > probably keep it in case it will be needed in the future. And as with > the flats, peoble would still sell them, but probably not update the > registry and then we have other, serious problems. > > So even if it seems unfair that early adopters can make money from > something they once got more or less for free, the alternatives are > less tempting. > > Cheers, > > Daniel > > On Fri, 12 Feb 2016, Dariusz Siedlecki wrote: > >> Witam, >> >> I agree 100% with this opinion. >> >> It should be prohibited to sell/buy address space between two LIR >> (not /22 also olders assignments). >> It should be some solidarity or prices should be regulated by RIPE >> not by market. >> >> Now companies who have lot of IPv4 are against any changes. >> New companies have tied hands. >> And RIPE is in the middle. >> >> But they all pay the same fee. >> >> Best regards >> Dariusz >> >> >>> On 12/02/2016 09:34, Kurt Jaeger wrote: >>> > No, seriously: use IPv6. >>> Most of my customers have IPv6. >>> Sadly, the rest of the do not >>> >>> On 12/02/2016 11:59, Dominik Nowacki wrote: >>> > This, or CG NAT. 1 village / end point / 1-2 IPs and CG NAT for >>> the > whole village + /56 IPv6 per household. >>> Is really CGNAT the RIPE-NCC solution for ipv4 exhaustion ? >>> As a network engineer, and as a customer, CGNAT look like the worst >>> solution. >>> >>> >>> To answer the talk from Gert and other, about the holy mission of the >>> RIPE, I agree with them, somehow. >>> The RIPE is supposed to show justice, right ? Equality ? Good not >>> evil ? >>> >>> Let's reap all useless IPv4. >>> You want to sell IPv4 ? Obviously, you do not need that subnet. >>> You do not announce that subnet over the internet ? Reaped. >>> You want to transfert that subnet between two obviously not related >>> compagny ? Reaped. >>> >>> As the Protector of the weaks, and to preserve viability of the >>> newcommers, the RIPE-NCC *must not* allow people to make business >>> on the >>> back of the new. >>> IPv4 are a resource of common interest, not a plot of land that can be >>> sell to the richer. >>> >>> Do not you think ? >>> >> >> >> ---- >> If you don't want to receive emails from the RIPE NCC members-discuss >> mailing list, please log in to your LIR Portal account and go to the >> general page: >> https://lirportal.ripe.net/general/ >> >> Click on "Edit my LIR details", under "Subscribed Mailing Lists". >> From here, you can add or remove addresses. > > _________________________________________________________________________________ > > Daniel Stolpe Tel: 08 - 688 11 81 stolpe at resilans.se > Resilans AB Fax: 08 - 55 00 21 63 http://www.resilans.se/ > Box 45 094 556741-1193 > 104 30 Stockholm > > > ---- > If you don't want to receive emails from the RIPE NCC members-discuss > mailing list, please log in to your LIR Portal account and go to the > general page: > https://lirportal.ripe.net/general/ > > Click on "Edit my LIR details", under "Subscribed Mailing Lists". From > here, you can add or remove addresses.
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [news] RIPE NCC Members and Multiple LIR Accounts
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [news] RIPE NCC Members and Multiple LIR Accounts
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]