This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [news] RIPE NCC Members and Multiple LIR Accounts
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [news] RIPE NCC Members and Multiple LIR Accounts
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Multiple LIR discussion and courteous behaviour
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Tore Anderson
tore at redpill-linpro.com
Fri Feb 12 13:22:37 CET 2016
* Hans Petter Holen <hph at oslo.net> > On 12.02.2016 10.07, Tore Anderson wrote: > > It would also be important that "entity" isn't understood to simply > > mean "an entry in a country's organisation register", as that would > > leave a gaping and trivially exploitable loophole. > How should it be understood then? I do not presume to have any good answer. I would assume the NCC and/or the board would be in a better position to attempt to come up with a good definition. If that on the other hand should turn out to be impossible, restricting the number of LIRs per organisation seems like an exercise in futility to me. Case in point: https://w2.brreg.no/enhet/sok/treffliste.jsp?navn=domene%20klubben&orgform=0&fylke=0&kommune=0 Background: *.no domain registrations used to be limited to a maximum of 10 domains per business. Private persons were supposed to use *.priv.no instead. It's quite obvious what actually happened. («Domene Klubben» translates as «The Domain Club».) Tore
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [news] RIPE NCC Members and Multiple LIR Accounts
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Multiple LIR discussion and courteous behaviour
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]