[members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [news] RIPE NCC Members and Multiple LIR Accounts
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [news] RIPE NCC Members and Multiple LIR Accounts
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [news] RIPE NCC Members and Multiple LIR Accounts
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Administrator - [ inAsset | NixMad ]
admin at inasset.es
Fri Feb 12 13:05:01 CET 2016
+1 This should be discussed in the next RIPE Meeting. There are companies with a lot of unused space. Administration - [ inAsset | NixMad ] P : +34 911 335 002 F : +34 911 701 242 E-mail : admin at inasset.es / admin at trueinter.net Video : https://vimeo.com/nixmad/inasset <https://vimeo.com/nixmad/inasset> —————— We deliver True Internet <https://inasset.es/> <https://inasset.es/> > El 12 feb 2016, a las 13:03, Dariusz Siedlecki <dariusz.siedlecki at olss.pl> escribió: > > Witam, > > I agree 100% with this opinion. > > It should be prohibited to sell/buy address space between two LIR (not /22 also olders assignments). > It should be some solidarity or prices should be regulated by RIPE not by market. > > Now companies who have lot of IPv4 are against any changes. > New companies have tied hands. > And RIPE is in the middle. > > But they all pay the same fee. > > Best regards > Dariusz > > >> On 12/02/2016 09:34, Kurt Jaeger wrote: >>> No, seriously: use IPv6. >> Most of my customers have IPv6. >> Sadly, the rest of the do not >> >> On 12/02/2016 11:59, Dominik Nowacki wrote: >>> This, or CG NAT. 1 village / end point / 1-2 IPs and CG NAT for the whole village + /56 IPv6 per household. >> Is really CGNAT the RIPE-NCC solution for ipv4 exhaustion ? >> As a network engineer, and as a customer, CGNAT look like the worst >> solution. >> >> >> To answer the talk from Gert and other, about the holy mission of the >> RIPE, I agree with them, somehow. >> The RIPE is supposed to show justice, right ? Equality ? Good not evil ? >> >> Let's reap all useless IPv4. >> You want to sell IPv4 ? Obviously, you do not need that subnet. >> You do not announce that subnet over the internet ? Reaped. >> You want to transfert that subnet between two obviously not related >> compagny ? Reaped. >> >> As the Protector of the weaks, and to preserve viability of the >> newcommers, the RIPE-NCC *must not* allow people to make business on the >> back of the new. >> IPv4 are a resource of common interest, not a plot of land that can be >> sell to the richer. >> >> Do not you think ? >> > > > ---- > If you don't want to receive emails from the RIPE NCC members-discuss > mailing list, please log in to your LIR Portal account and go to the general page: > https://lirportal.ripe.net/general/ > > Click on "Edit my LIR details", under "Subscribed Mailing Lists". From here, you can add or remove addresses. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20160212/1fd4d80d/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: PastedGraphic-1.tiff Type: image/tiff Size: 29602 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20160212/1fd4d80d/attachment.tiff>
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [news] RIPE NCC Members and Multiple LIR Accounts
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [news] RIPE NCC Members and Multiple LIR Accounts
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]