This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [news] RIPE NCC Members and Multiple LIR Accounts
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [news] RIPE NCC Members and Multiple LIR Accounts
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [news] RIPE NCC Members and Multiple LIR Accounts
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Administrator - [ inAsset | NixMad ]
admin at inasset.es
Fri Feb 12 13:05:01 CET 2016
+1 This should be discussed in the next RIPE Meeting. There are companies with a lot of unused space. Administration - [ inAsset | NixMad ] P : +34 911 335 002 F : +34 911 701 242 E-mail : admin at inasset.es / admin at trueinter.net Video : https://vimeo.com/nixmad/inasset <https://vimeo.com/nixmad/inasset> —————— We deliver True Internet <https://inasset.es/> <https://inasset.es/> > El 12 feb 2016, a las 13:03, Dariusz Siedlecki <dariusz.siedlecki at olss.pl> escribió: > > Witam, > > I agree 100% with this opinion. > > It should be prohibited to sell/buy address space between two LIR (not /22 also olders assignments). > It should be some solidarity or prices should be regulated by RIPE not by market. > > Now companies who have lot of IPv4 are against any changes. > New companies have tied hands. > And RIPE is in the middle. > > But they all pay the same fee. > > Best regards > Dariusz > > >> On 12/02/2016 09:34, Kurt Jaeger wrote: >>> No, seriously: use IPv6. >> Most of my customers have IPv6. >> Sadly, the rest of the do not >> >> On 12/02/2016 11:59, Dominik Nowacki wrote: >>> This, or CG NAT. 1 village / end point / 1-2 IPs and CG NAT for the whole village + /56 IPv6 per household. >> Is really CGNAT the RIPE-NCC solution for ipv4 exhaustion ? >> As a network engineer, and as a customer, CGNAT look like the worst >> solution. >> >> >> To answer the talk from Gert and other, about the holy mission of the >> RIPE, I agree with them, somehow. >> The RIPE is supposed to show justice, right ? Equality ? Good not evil ? >> >> Let's reap all useless IPv4. >> You want to sell IPv4 ? Obviously, you do not need that subnet. >> You do not announce that subnet over the internet ? Reaped. >> You want to transfert that subnet between two obviously not related >> compagny ? Reaped. >> >> As the Protector of the weaks, and to preserve viability of the >> newcommers, the RIPE-NCC *must not* allow people to make business on the >> back of the new. >> IPv4 are a resource of common interest, not a plot of land that can be >> sell to the richer. >> >> Do not you think ? >> > > > ---- > If you don't want to receive emails from the RIPE NCC members-discuss > mailing list, please log in to your LIR Portal account and go to the general page: > https://lirportal.ripe.net/general/ > > Click on "Edit my LIR details", under "Subscribed Mailing Lists". From here, you can add or remove addresses. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20160212/1fd4d80d/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: PastedGraphic-1.tiff Type: image/tiff Size: 29602 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20160212/1fd4d80d/attachment.tiff>
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [news] RIPE NCC Members and Multiple LIR Accounts
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [news] RIPE NCC Members and Multiple LIR Accounts
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]