[members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [news] RIPE NCC Members and Multiple LIR Accounts

On 12/02/2016 09:34, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
> No, seriously: use IPv6.

Most of my customers have IPv6.
Sadly, the rest of the do not

On 12/02/2016 11:59, Dominik Nowacki wrote:
> This, or CG NAT. 1 village / end point / 1-2 IPs and CG NAT for the whole village + /56 IPv6 per household.

Is really CGNAT the RIPE-NCC solution for ipv4 exhaustion ?
As a network engineer, and as a customer, CGNAT look like the worst
solution.


To answer the talk from Gert and other, about the holy mission of the
RIPE, I agree with them, somehow.
The RIPE is supposed to show justice, right ? Equality ? Good not evil ?

Let's reap all useless IPv4.
You want to sell IPv4 ? Obviously, you do not need that subnet.
You do not announce that subnet over the internet ? Reaped.
You want to transfert that subnet between two obviously not related
compagny ? Reaped.

As the Protector of the weaks, and to preserve viability of the
newcommers, the RIPE-NCC *must not* allow people to make business on the
back of the new.
IPv4 are a resource of common interest, not a plot of land that can be
sell to the richer.

Do not you think ?

-- 
Jack
Kwaoo noc

More details about KWAOO can be found at:
https://as24904.kwaoo.net/