This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [news] RIPE NCC Members and Multiple LIR Accounts - Please Discuss
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [news] RIPE NCC Members and Multiple LIR Accounts - Please Discuss
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [rt.cablenetcy.net #218339] AutoReply: Re: [ncc-announce] [news] RIPE NCC Members and Multiple LIR Accounts - Please Discuss
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Wolfgang Tremmel
wolfgang.tremmel at de-cix.net
Fri Feb 12 09:52:03 CET 2016
> On 11.02.2016, at 17:34, Sascha Luck [ml] <ripe-md at c4inet.net> wrote: > > a) an entity opens another LIR AND > b) it does so in order to circumvent policy I do not see any other reason for a legal entity to *open* a 2nd LIR except to circumvent policy. It is a different thing on mergers and on different entities under common management where there might legitimate reasons like: - having one legal entity per country or - having different legal entities for different parts of the business Also I see no way for NCC to check on point b), so I am in favor of the simple "if you have one (or already more then one) LIR, you do not get another one for the same legal entity" rule. best regards Wolfgang
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [news] RIPE NCC Members and Multiple LIR Accounts - Please Discuss
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [rt.cablenetcy.net #218339] AutoReply: Re: [ncc-announce] [news] RIPE NCC Members and Multiple LIR Accounts - Please Discuss
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]