This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [news] RIPE NCC Members and Multiple LIR Accounts
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [news] RIPE NCC Members and Multiple LIR Accounts
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [news] RIPE NCC Members and Multiple LIR Accounts
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Alexandr Gurbo
a.gurbo at severen.ru
Fri Feb 12 09:31:22 CET 2016
This is not right way. What should to do if ipv4 resources in company exhausted? Stopp business? There are different ways, but the cheaper on my opinion - create new legal entity, open new LIR on this entity, receive /22 and merge companies and LIR. I basically will not work with the profiteers, and to buy their ipv4 resources. Ideal scheme form me: one legal entity - one LIR. And I think that RIPE NCC should give for new LIR more than /22, e.x. /21 or better /20. First, they will distribute the remains ipv4 addresses. No ipv4 resources - no problems for RIPE NCC. Secondly, if you sell ipv4 resources, so you do not need resources and you should return resource to RIPE NCC. Thirdly, in nearest future we will have problem with full routing table, and not all members support idea for upgrade border routers. Because someone has divided its blocks at /24 and announce in world. We should discuss about policy with prohibition annonce /23-/32 in routing table. If you want announce /24 locally in yours region, please announce, but in the rest world we should see you via aggregated route by your upstream. >1. Is the activity of members opening additional LIR accounts a problem >that must be prevented? Not a problem if new legal entity. >2. If this activity is a problem that must be prevented, what action >should the RIPE NCC take to attempt its prevention? Give more address space - /20, struggle with speculators, policy with minimum allocation in the world table. On Thu, 11 Feb 2016 17:43:16 +0200 Hank Nussbacher <hank at efes.iucc.ac.il> wrote: > I think members opening additional LIR accounts goes against the spirit > and history of RIPE. > If Level3, Google, Akamai and others open multiple LIR accounts, I will > then change my opinion. > > I also believe RIPE should not grant multiple LIR accounts additional > requests for /22s. > > Regards, > Hank Nussbacher > IUCC > > > ---- > If you don't want to receive emails from the RIPE NCC members-discuss > mailing list, please log in to your LIR Portal account and go to the general page: > https://lirportal.ripe.net/general/ > > Click on "Edit my LIR details", under "Subscribed Mailing Lists". From here, you can add or remove addresses. -- Alexandr Gurbo
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [news] RIPE NCC Members and Multiple LIR Accounts
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [news] RIPE NCC Members and Multiple LIR Accounts
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]