[members-discuss] ripe objects as single text field
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [db-wg] ripe objects as single text field
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] ripe objects as single text field
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Daniel Suchy
danny at danysek.cz
Wed Nov 25 20:29:37 CET 2015
Hello, I also support return to previous state. And in general I suggest to be more conservative in such changes - these aren't helping with keeping database accuracy (some people may refuse learn "new approach"). With regards, Daniel On 25.11.2015 19:20, Denis Fondras wrote: >> Same, I always use single text area, I guess I got used to it when it was >> mail only and it stuck. To me a field-based editor is more clunky and slower >> to use. >> > > I can only agree. > > Denis > > ---- > If you don't want to receive emails from the RIPE NCC members-discuss > mailing list, please log in to your LIR Portal account and go to the general page: > https://lirportal.ripe.net/general/ > > Click on "Edit my LIR details", under "Subscribed Mailing Lists". From here, you can add or remove addresses. > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 4233 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20151125/6afb4058/attachment.p7s>
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [db-wg] ripe objects as single text field
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] ripe objects as single text field
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]