[members-discuss] [db-wg] ripe objects as single text field

Same, the new process of searching the record first, then copying and pasting into “SyncUpdates” to get the equivalent functionality that was previously there seems much less intuitive. 

If you could drag the objects you maintain from a listbox/select box into the object data field in “SyncUpdates” that to me would be a lot more intuitive. I appreciate the idea behind “SyncUpdates” is to allow multiple objects to be updated at once but if you’re having to tab and search those records in another page to copy/paste them in it seems more disjointed and clunky than it used to be, Am I missing something?
Kind Regards

Dean  

  

Dean Johnston  /  Managing Director
(0191) 244 9910  /  dean at call27.net

Call27 Limited  Office: 0800 118 5527    
86-90 Paul Street, London, UK. EC2A 4NE  
http://www.call27.net

    

This e-mail message may contain confidential or legally privileged information and is intended only for the use of the intended recipient(s). Any unauthorised disclosure, dissemination, distribution, copying or the taking of any action in reliance on the information herein is prohibited. E-mails are not secure and cannot be guaranteed to be error free as they can be intercepted, amended, or contain viruses. Anyone who communicates with us by e-mail is deemed to have accepted these risks. Call27 is not responsible for errors or omissions in this message and denies any responsibility for any damage arising from the use of e-mail. Any opinion and other statement contained in this message and any attachment are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the company.


From: Stepan Kucherenko <twh at megagroup.ru>
Reply: Stepan Kucherenko <twh at megagroup.ru>
Date: 25 November 2015 at 17:57:23
To: members-discuss at ripe.net <members-discuss at ripe.net>
Subject:  Re: [members-discuss] [db-wg] ripe objects as single text field  

Same, I always use single text area, I guess I got used to it when it  
was mail only and it stuck. To me a field-based editor is more clunky  
and slower to use.  

On 25.11.2015 19:47, Jamie Stallwood wrote:  
> Alexander Zubkov wrote:  
>> Edit an existing object in a single text area may be not popular,  
>> but making somewhat complex editing  
>> may me easier with it. It may be less used but not less needed.  
>> I vote for keeping single text area editing of objects.  
>> I think the easy way to reimplement it - is to add button for  
>> editing in single text area which will open "syncupdates" page  
>> with already copy-pasted text.  
>  
> Or in the field-based editor, a button to convert to single-area editing. I don't mind, just bring the feature back.  
>  
> Kind regards  
> Jamie Stallwood  
>  
> Jamie Stallwood  
> Networks and Security Specialist  
> Imerja Limited  
>  
> NIC Handle: uk.imerja.JS7259-RIPE  
>  
>  
> ----  
> If you don't want to receive emails from the RIPE NCC members-discuss  
> mailing list, please log in to your LIR Portal account and go to the general page:  
> https://lirportal.ripe.net/general/  
>  
> Click on "Edit my LIR details", under "Subscribed Mailing Lists". From here, you can add or remove addresses.  
>  

----  
If you don't want to receive emails from the RIPE NCC members-discuss  
mailing list, please log in to your LIR Portal account and go to the general page:  
https://lirportal.ripe.net/general/  

Click on "Edit my LIR details", under "Subscribed Mailing Lists". From here, you can add or remove addresses.  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20151125/c441673e/attachment.html>