This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [news] Board Resolution to Suspend Creation of Multiple LIR Accounts
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [news] Board Resolution to Suspend Creation of Multiple LIR Accounts
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [news] Board Resolution to Suspend Creation of Multiple LIR Accounts
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sascha Luck [ml]
ripe-md at c4inet.net
Thu Nov 19 17:33:42 CET 2015
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 05:19:42PM +0100, Richard Hartmann wrote: >Very much related, this German article[1] claims that in November, >2000 new LIRs were created, bringing the total amount of LIRs to >almost 13,000. Can someone reconfirm with official numbers, please? Actually, I would like to see some numbers too (LIR/entity creation). So far we have nothing but the allegation of one participant that a problem actually exists. >I am _very_ much concerned about what that means for any potential >future GMs if those, let's call them creative, people and LIRs vote en >bloc. If they are owned by the same entity, it already only has one vote. If they are not, I cannot see how you could prevent them from voting whichever way they see fit. And yes, with ~5-6% turn-out, bloc voting could have a significant effect. rgds, Sascha Luck
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [news] Board Resolution to Suspend Creation of Multiple LIR Accounts
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [news] Board Resolution to Suspend Creation of Multiple LIR Accounts
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]