[members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2016
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2016
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2016
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Lu
h.lu at anytimechinese.com
Sun Mar 29 18:03:21 CEST 2015
Hey guys: In principle I understand the policy part, but the chance someone would give up their 16bits ASN over 50euro is very small-if any. And for 32 bits, I think we have more than enough. > On 2015年3月29日, at 下午5:48, Nick Hilliard <nick at netability.ie> wrote: > >> On 29/03/2015 15:05, Elvis Daniel Velea wrote: >> I do not really believe that the purpose of this discussion has ever been >> garbage collection. >> It may seem like that but I doubt it. > > Elvis, it has been very clear from the beginning - in AP-WG, the last GM > and on members-discuss@ - that one of the primary aims of charging for ASNs > is ASN16 garbage collection. > > Nick > > > ---- > If you don't want to receive emails from the RIPE NCC members-discuss > mailing list, please log in to your LIR Portal account and go to the general page: > https://lirportal.ripe.net/general/ > > Click on "Edit my LIR details", under "Subscribed Mailing Lists". From here, you can add or remove addresses.
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2016
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2016
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]