[members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2016

Hi Brandon,

I do not really believe that the purpose of this discussion has ever 
been garbage collection.
It may seem like that but I doubt it.

As Daniel pointed out, there are stats showing that the RIPE NCC has 
been allocated 25624(AS16)+5632(AS32)= 31256 out of which 4128 are not 
assigned yet.
That makes it 27128 assigned ASNs. If each would have a (very low) 50E 
fee, that would bring ~1.35M Eur additional budget to the RIPE NCC which 
could be spent on outreach or could be used to lower member fees.
I think that is the discussion we are having and I believe this has 
always been the reasoning for the presentation at the GM and the noise 
on the mailing list.

I also think we should forget about garbage collection in ASN16 because 
it will never happen. If companies/LIRs ever decide to hand ASN16 back, 
it's only because they want to, nobody will be able to 'force' them, 
either by adding a fee to the ASN or by chasing them when the ASN is not 
in use.

 From my point of view, ASN16s, once depleted (and we are still a couple 
of years from that moment), will have a value and will be traded.. if 
you need one to be able to use communities in BGP, you buy one... 
otherwise, you get a 32bit from the RIPE NCC for free.

This is my last reply on this topic, I think I have made myself very clear.

Regards,
Elvis

On 29/03/15 15:24, Brandon Butterworth wrote:
>> I'm not that sure anymore, the AS transfer policy is being implemented
>> and ASN16s will soon have a value once the free pool is depleted.
> People have learnt from v4 that you don't give up scarce things.
>
> One day people will pay for them, and as I said the other week if you
> want to garbage collect them you'd have to charge a high price to make
> it worth giving up (or pay as others have suggested) and people won't
> vote for that. A 50 Euro fee is way too low to do it and a pointless
> complication to the simplified charging scheme.
>
> I also doubt the unadvertised figure gives the whole picture, some will
> be used privately (no idea how many).
>
> I think trying to retrofit other hand back schemes now is futile (it
> was hard to hand back once, back when people wanted to hand back)
>
> brandon


-- 
<http://v4escrow.net> 	


  Elvis Daniel Velea


    Chief Executive Officer

Email: elvis at V4Escrow.net <mailto:elvis at v4escrow.net>
US Phone: +1 (702) 475 5914
EU Phone: +31 (0) 61458 1914

Recognised IPv4 Broker/Facilitator in:

This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain 
privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have 
received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately and 
delete the original.Any other use of this email is strictly prohibited.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20150329/fd867e33/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: logo.png
Type: image/png
Size: 5043 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20150329/fd867e33/attachment.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 1.png
Type: image/png
Size: 11971 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20150329/fd867e33/attachment-0001.png>