This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2016
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2016
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2016
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sascha Luck [ml]
ripe-md at c4inet.net
Sat Mar 28 23:25:25 CET 2015
On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 12:11:35AM +0300, Fahad AlShirawi wrote: >NCC gives us an estimate of any costs directly associated with >ASN billing, risk assessment if any, and we vote on whether or >not we want the NCC to pursue another option in the future that >is ASN billing related. Yes? There is nothing to stop the board from proposing a CS option with an ASN charge >0 now. Do I understand you correctly in that this vote should determine whether the NCC will *always* have to present a CS option with ASN charge >0 or just for the next CS proposal? rgds, Sascha Luck
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2016
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2016
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]