This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2016
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2016
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2016
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nick Hilliard
nick at netability.ie
Sat Mar 28 19:46:58 CET 2015
On 28/03/2015 18:28, Nigel Titley wrote: > But I would very gently remind folk that the board did present a charging > scheme back in 2012, which took into account an ASN charge and which the > membership voted down. Nigel, as I pointed out in my email of earlier today, the charging scheme options in the General Meeting of 2012 were structured in such a way that the only way to retain an ASN charge would have been for the membership to have voted down all the alternative options - all of which were more favourable in nearly every other respect. This does not reasonably reflect membership opinion on whether there should be a separate charge for ASNs. Nick
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2016
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2016
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]