This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2016
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [Ticket#2015032901000081] [ncc-announce] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2016
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2016
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nick Hilliard
nick at netability.ie
Sat Mar 28 15:26:36 CET 2015
On 28/03/2015 09:53, Hans Petter Holen wrote: > Please remember that thee was a taskforce on the charging scheme, and a > change of the scheme by the RIPE GA in September 2012, long after 2007-1. More to the point, the voting mechanism for the 2013 charging scheme was structured so that all of the new proposals explicitly wrote out charging for ASNs. This meant that the only way to retain charging for ASNs was for the NCC membership to reject all of the new proposals and default back to the ancient, byzantine charging mechanism: > https://www.ripe.net/lir-services/ncc/gm/september-2012/agenda I.e. there was not a viable option for the membership to express an opinion either way on charging for ASNs. Nick
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [Ticket#2015032901000081] [ncc-announce] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2016
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2016
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]