This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2016
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2016
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2016
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Lu Heng
h.lu at outsideheaven.com
Sat Mar 28 14:30:29 CET 2015
Hi Gert: I fully understand your point, but I also feel a bit tried of seeing this huge "fee" discussion every year in which might be good idea just to leave it as it is. p.s. I still get ticket system reply while sending to member list, but seems it has getting much better(I only got 2 reply instead of 6 or 7 replies in the past). On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 2:16 PM, Gert Doering <gert at space.net> wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 02:06:17PM +0100, Lu Heng wrote: >> I really think the RIPE fee are low enough that not even getting to be >> considered to be part of business expense(almost 100 euro/month, my >> personal gym member fee was like that), consider the large growth of >> member base for upcoming years and Ripe has no plan to increase staff >> as far as I hard from what said in last GM, the fee will keep >> dropping, I think most member would agree there is no real need to >> change it in term of financial reason. > > The total amount is actually not what Sander and I are upset about. > > It's really about the inherent conflict between the RIPE NCC being > tasked to implement community policy and at the same time being paid > by commercial members, which might have a different view on priorities, > and the NCC board being caught in between. > > (And to a certain part, frustration with the actual community that always > needs financial incentives to do the right thing, namely: return unused > resources, like AS numbers) > > Gert Doering > -- NetMaster > -- > have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? > > SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard > Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann > D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) > Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 -- This transmission is intended solely for the addressee(s) shown above. It may contain information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons other than the intended addressee(s) is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify this office immediately and e-mail the original at the sender's address above by replying to this message and including the text of the transmission received.
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2016
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2016
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]