This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2016
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2016
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2016
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Lu Heng
h.lu at outsideheaven.com
Sat Mar 28 14:06:17 CET 2015
Hi I really think the RIPE fee are low enough that not even getting to be considered to be part of business expense(almost 100 euro/month, my personal gym member fee was like that), consider the large growth of member base for upcoming years and Ripe has no plan to increase staff as far as I hard from what said in last GM, the fee will keep dropping, I think most member would agree there is no real need to change it in term of financial reason. On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 1:55 PM, Gert Doering <gert at space.net> wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 03:46:26PM +0300, Fahad AlShirawi wrote: >> In this whole discussion the board hasn't said a single word. >> They are listening to try and determine what's the way forward. It >> surprises me that you would outright attack them like this? As >> someone who chose to step down from that same exact board, I find >> the accusation that they aren't trying to do what the membership >> wants, and where aligned, what the community wants, a little hurtful. >> My experience is that the board has never ignored. > > This is exactly the problem: the change in 2012 was based solely on what > a (small, but loud) part of the *membership* wanted, and it was changing > policy-relevant parts of the AGM without involving the AP *community* on > this. > > I am fairly sure I said it back then as well: the way new charging > schemes are usually presented ("take this or leave it") does not actually > help - if people overall agree with the changes, like "it will get cheaper > for me!", but still disagree with the policy implications, what are they > supposed to vote for? > > My memory of specific events and "who said what" is getting muddled, though, > and as I said, I was just too tired back in 2012 to put up a bigger fight. > > (The whole way all aspects of 2007-01 were handled by the board did not > exactly feel like "gettings support" anyway - it more felt like "wading > through morasses of subtle hindrance") > > Gert Doering > -- NetMaster > -- > have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? > > SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard > Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann > D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) > Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 > > ---- > If you don't want to receive emails from the RIPE NCC members-discuss > mailing list, please log in to your LIR Portal account and go to the general page: > https://lirportal.ripe.net/general/ > > Click on "Edit my LIR details", under "Subscribed Mailing Lists". From here, you can add or remove addresses. -- This transmission is intended solely for the addressee(s) shown above. It may contain information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons other than the intended addressee(s) is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify this office immediately and e-mail the original at the sender's address above by replying to this message and including the text of the transmission received.
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2016
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2016
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]