[members-discuss] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2016
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2016
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2016
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Lars-Johan Liman
liman at netnod.se
Wed Mar 25 16:40:54 CET 2015
Hi Fahad, fahad at gccix.net: > Liman, > There is no cost for IP. IP is allocated on a need basis. The cost is > for the membership. This is an important distinction to observe :) I realise I should have swapped in that memory module and read up on the details before posting :-), but the point I was trying to support is that moving the markers is not a policy decision, but a membership decision IMOUO*. Cheers, /Liman * In my obviously uninformed opinion. :-)
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2016
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2016
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]