[members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2016

Sander I have to agree with this. While the NCC does serve the community the liability is towards the membership. Legally the membership has to ratify whatever the board does. The membership is definitely part of the community but the law only observes the relationship with the membership. If you would like to see charges for ASNs and others in the community who are also members support this, then a discussion on here is definitely the first step but you will eventually have to add it to the agenda of the GM for discussion and voting. Personally I don't think the members will vote for it.


Fahad.


Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.
  Original Message  
From: Sascha Luck [ml]
Sent: Tuesday, 24 March 2015 20:01
To: members-discuss at ripe.net
Subject: Re: [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2016

On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 04:04:07PM +0100, Sander Steffann wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> Could you clarify what policy you are referring to?
>
>The 2007-01 policy proposal that introduced it for all independent resources: IPv4, IPv6 and ASNs.

2007-01 called for a charge for PI resources, in the case of
ASNs, the Board has decided - and the membership has voted for
some years now - to set this charge at zero. 

I don't want a situation where policy determines the charges the
members have to pay. This should always be a decision of the
board and the membership.

rgds,
Sascha Luck

----
If you don't want to receive emails from the RIPE NCC members-discuss
mailing list, please log in to your LIR Portal account and go to the general page:
https://lirportal.ripe.net/general/

Click on "Edit my LIR details", under "Subscribed Mailing Lists". From here, you can add or remove addresses.