This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[members-discuss] NCC changing descr fields
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] NCC changing descr fields
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] NCC changing descr fields
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Daniel Stolpe
stolpe at resilans.se
Wed Jun 3 14:32:50 CEST 2015
Hi Paul, What causes confusion is probably that it used to be mandatory to have the "descr:" field be exactly the org name of the holder, until the NCC very recently realised that since the "org:" pointer is now mandatory, demanding the same date in "descr:" was not needed any more. So be patient, and you should be able to put whatever you like there. Hopefully. Cheers, Daniel Stolpe On Wed, 3 Jun 2015, Paul Civati wrote: > It seems as though someone has decided to run a process of 'tidying up' > in the RIPE db by fiddling with descr fields. > > I've been informed that: > > === > During one of our data consistency checks, we saw that the resource holder > information for these resources is not consistent: > x.x.x.0-y.y.y.255 > > We will therefore be updating the resource holder information in the RIPE > database objects to <company> and ORG-xxxx-RIPE on 2015-06-08." > === > > This is somewhat mysterious, vague and puzzling > > Confusing because all the relevant handle and organisation records point > to the correct objects for this block. > > Upon asking NCC what they are doing, I'm told that the descr field is incorrect > and will be amended, actually to remove from it "London". > > What on earth is the point of this whole exercise? > > This has generated confusion on my part and a waste of support resource in NCC > to deal with my query. > > We already have admin, tech and org fields that point to the identifying organisation > for the object but now someone has decided that the descr field must have duplicated > information. > > The help section in whois mentions nothing about what data is to be in descr > field, nor do I recall any mandate that it must be set to the name of the organisation. > > I can't be the only one confused by this vague change and asking NCC what is going > on and why. > > Summary: seems a totally pointless waste of time. > > I guess someone in NCC was bored because I can't see any other point of this. > > Regards, > Paul. > > -- > Paul Civati <paul(at)racksense.com> 0870 321 2855 > Rack Sense Ltd - Managed Service Provider - www.racksense.com > > > ---- > If you don't want to receive emails from the RIPE NCC members-discuss > mailing list, please log in to your LIR Portal account and go to the general page: > https://lirportal.ripe.net/general/ > > Click on "Edit my LIR details", under "Subscribed Mailing Lists". From here, you can add or remove addresses. _________________________________________________________________________________ Daniel Stolpe Tel: 08 - 688 11 81 stolpe at resilans.se Resilans AB Fax: 08 - 55 00 21 63 http://www.resilans.se/ Box 45 094 556741-1193 104 30 Stockholm
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] NCC changing descr fields
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] NCC changing descr fields
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]