This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] Request to amend the RIPE NCC Articles of Association
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Request to amend the RIPE NCC Articles of Association
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Request to amend the RIPE NCC Articles of Association
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sascha Luck
lists-ripe at c4inet.net
Wed Jun 25 16:58:38 CEST 2014
Hi Dave, all, On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 02:59:50PM +0100, Dave Wilson wrote: >I actually think this is not so fair. The "magic" is revealed in detail >in the voting report and its linked documents. Every single vote is >listed with its receipt number (I checked mine) and the result of each >count is reported, and itself verifiable. This is linked from the web >page for the GM. I'd call that a problem, actually. While it is nice to be able to verify that my vote was correctly counted, the secret ballot exists for one reason: to prevent vote buying, as the buyer will not be able to make sure the payee voted as "contracted". If the voting results are publically available, linked to receipt #, this verification is possible... cheers, Sascha Luck
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Request to amend the RIPE NCC Articles of Association
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Request to amend the RIPE NCC Articles of Association
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]