This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] Request to amend the RIPE NCC Articles of Association
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Request to amend the RIPE NCC Articles of Association
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Request to amend the RIPE NCC Articles of Association
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sander Steffann
sander at steffann.nl
Wed Jun 25 14:23:16 CEST 2014
Hi Nigel, Op 25 jun. 2014, om 13:02 heeft Nigel Titley <nigel at titley.com> het volgende geschreven: > On 25/06/14 01:31, Rob Golding wrote: >>> Well, this is one thing we were asking about. We currently allow a >>> voting window of 16 hours (which is an improvement on the original 15 >>> mins). How much time do you think would be reasonable? >> I'd be happy with 2 days/48-hours >> > This would mean that the results wouldn't be available during the > meeting (as we normally hold the members' meeting on Wednesday evening). > > If this isn't a problem then fine, but we've had indications that people > like to know the result during the meeting. Indeed. Discussing the results of the voting, congratulating new board members, thanking old board members etc has to be part of the meeting in my opinion. A voting window of 24 hours seems the most fair to everybody because 24 hours will include one normal full working day for everybody. Cheers, Sander
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Request to amend the RIPE NCC Articles of Association
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Request to amend the RIPE NCC Articles of Association
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]