This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] Request to amend the RIPE NCC Articles of Association
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Request to amend the RIPE NCC Articles of Association
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Request to amend the RIPE NCC Articles of Association
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nigel Titley
nigel at titley.com
Tue Jun 24 22:24:58 CEST 2014
On 24/06/14 16:38, rob.golding at astutium.com wrote: > I have no problem with paper (although a the RIPE region is quite large, > that does involve it's own problems) or e-voting as such - I'll use > whichever is most convenient to me. > > What I do require though, is enough time to cast my vote and that is the > major failing of the current system. Well, this is one thing we were asking about. We currently allow a voting window of 16 hours (which is an improvement on the original 15 mins). How much time do you think would be reasonable? Nigel
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Request to amend the RIPE NCC Articles of Association
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Request to amend the RIPE NCC Articles of Association
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]