This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[members-discuss] Request to amend the RIPE NCC Articles of Association
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Request to amend the RIPE NCC Articles of Association
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Request to amend the RIPE NCC Articles of Association
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nigel Titley
nigel at titley.com
Tue Jun 24 17:03:05 CEST 2014
On 24/06/14 15:47, Daniel Stolpe wrote: > > Well said Nick. One may think that paper ballots are low tech and old > fashioned but I still see a point concerning anonymity. Just as a point of fact, the RIPE NCC doesn't get to see who voted or what they voted (and I'm sure you aren't suggesting this). If you outsource anything there is always a degree of trust involved. We looked at the costs of doing this in-house and it just wasn't economical. In the end we tried to take a middle road of allowing electronic voting to expand the franchise as far as possible, but retaining paper balloting and proxies for those really concerned about privacy. > > As far as I remember from what Fergal sais, all the paper ballots are > converted to e-votes anyway. Yes, indeed, but there is no privacy lost in the process. All the best Nigel
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Request to amend the RIPE NCC Articles of Association
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Request to amend the RIPE NCC Articles of Association
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]