This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[members-discuss] Dealing with automated ticket system replies
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Dealing with automated ticket system replies
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Dealing with automated ticket system replies
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nicolas Grässer
graesser at telemaxx.de
Tue Jun 17 16:40:33 CEST 2014
This is a really good idea, I would also prefer this solution.
+1
* Gert Doering <gert at space.net> [2014-06-13 17:25]:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 04:58:20PM +0200, Serge Radovcic wrote:
> > I would rather not un-subscribe email addresses without first
> > gaining permission.
>
> We do this on the address-policy mailing list - whoever sends an
> autoreply to a list post will be unsubscribed, and receive a notice why.
>
> This was proposed to the APWG list, and people agreed to it, so
> following community consensus.
>
> That's what I'd propose to do here as well:
>
> - propose to do it exactly that way ("who sends an autoreply gets
> unsubscribed, and informed about the reasons why")
> - wait 14 days for community feedback
> - if nobody protests, go there.
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Dealing with automated ticket system replies
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Dealing with automated ticket system replies
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]