This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[members-discuss] [csstaff] Complaints against LIRs ignored by NCC
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [csstaff] Complaints against LIRs ignored by NCC
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Complaints against LIRs ignored by NCC
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sander Steffann
sander at steffann.nl
Fri Nov 22 15:55:04 CET 2013
Hi Andrew, > Finally, I would like to assure members that the RIPE NCC adheres strictly to RIPE Policy in all its actions. A related RIPE Policy Proposal 2013-01, "Openness About Policy Violations", was today withdrawn from the Policy Development Process (PDP) by the proposers. A link to proposal itself as well as the proposers' reason for withdrawal are available at: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/2013-November/002528.html It was interesting to see this discussion here, at the same time that that policy proposal was withdrawn because of lack of interest/support from the community. If people here now think publishing more data on abuse report handling is a good idea after all then they should submit a new policy proposal for that. They can re-use as much text from 2013-01 as they like. Cheers, Sander
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [csstaff] Complaints against LIRs ignored by NCC
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Complaints against LIRs ignored by NCC
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]