[members-discuss] Complaints against LIRs ignored by NCC

Hi,

On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 05:41:45PM +0100, Andrea Cocito wrote:
> On Dec 12, 2013, at 5:39 PM, Gert Doering <gert at space.net> wrote:
> > IPv4 is *gone*, get over it.  No matter of discussion here or elsewhere
> > will bring back IPv4 in quantities needed to "last forever", so all you
> > are doing is postponing the inevitable, and burning lots of effort and
> > money in the denial phase.
> 
> Right, then if the fee scheme is changed in that way there will be no problem for LIRs who have millions of IPv4 addresses allocated to release them and save money :)

The fee scheme has been changed after exhaustive discussion (especially
with the bazillion ticket systems subscribed to this list) to "every LIR
pays the same".  Good luck finding a majority of voting members to agree
on anything else.

I, for one, will not agree to a fee that is directly based on the amount
of IPv4 address a LIR holds - wouldn't make a difference for us either
way, but because IPv4 is something that is increasingly irrelevant, and
not a good base for future funding of the NCC.

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 826 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20131212/36811285/attachment.sig>