[members-discuss] Complaints against LIRs ignored by NCC
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Complaints against LIRs ignored by NCC
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] IPV4 market
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Thu Dec 12 17:38:36 CET 2013
Hi, On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 04:00:15PM +0100, Andrea Cocito wrote: > - RIPE can not "sell" IP addresses: not true, RIPE already does have fees changing on the amount of allocated resources, the principle does not change (change the classes from small-medium-large to /4 /5 /6 /7 /8 ? /24, and give each class a fee, formally it is not a change in the model) We don't. Wake up, welcome to 2013. All LIRs pay the same fee today (except for PI handling per-resource, not by-size). Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 826 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20131212/32c2b892/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Complaints against LIRs ignored by NCC
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] IPV4 market
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]