This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] amendment proposal for the Article of association
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [rt.smartbunker.net #1622] AutoReply: Re: amendment proposal for the Article of association
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] amendment proposal for the Article of association
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
sergey myasoedov
kaa at net-art.cz
Wed Mar 28 12:37:27 CEST 2012
Dear James, You wrote Wednesday, March 28, 2012, 12:13:00 PM: > Is the issue that you want to add things to the agenda and you're > assuming that this is the only route? Have you spoke to the EB about this? Yes I have. > If that's the case maybe creating a process for the EB to consider > motions with a lower submission threshold might be more appropriate (if > there isn't one already)? The EB could be free to amend or reject any > suggestion as they see fit and if the EB decide not to progress it you > can always follow the direct route above. I will be happy if such procedure will be created, but currently EB is like a black box: they prefer not to disclose "excessive" information. I am convinced: there should be a way to request an information from the board like from the government. And this definitely should not be a private talk to EB member. -- Kind regards, sergey myasoedov
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [rt.smartbunker.net #1622] AutoReply: Re: amendment proposal for the Article of association
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] amendment proposal for the Article of association
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]