This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[members-discuss] amendment proposal for the Article ofassociation
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] amendment proposal for the Article ofassociation
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] amendment proposal for the Article of association
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
David Freedman
david.freedman at uk.clara.net
Wed Mar 28 11:18:45 CEST 2012
+1, I can't imagine a lesser value for this. Dave. On 28/03/2012 10:58, "Nina Hjorth Bargisen" <NIHB at tdc.dk> wrote: >I agree with kurtis on this. 2% of the eligible votes is very low already. > >/Nina > >-----Oprindelig meddelelse----- >Fra: members-discuss-bounces at ripe.net >[mailto:members-discuss-bounces at ripe.net] På vegne af Kurt Erik Lindqvist >Sendt: 28. marts 2012 10:04 >Til: sergey myasoedov >Cc: members-discuss at ripe.net >Emne: Re: [members-discuss] amendment proposal for the Article >ofassociation > > >On 27 mar 2012, at 20:07, sergey myasoedov wrote: > >> Currently at least 2% of members should vote for adding items into >>Agenda. >> Respective to the total number of members this means that _160_ LIRs >> should ask the EB to discuss something that is not included in the >>Agenda. >> >> From my opinion that is too much. No more than 250-300 members >> are usually attending GM, even with the electronic voting. And 2% >> threshold means ~50% of active members, so there is no possibility to >>raise any question to the GM level. >> >> And this is the reason for my proposal: to change the threshold >> in the section 15.6 of AoA to 0.3% or to 30 or 40 members. >> >> Any suggestions? > >I actually prefer to keep it the way it is. The 2% is referring to the >total number of eligible votes, not to the number of people attending the >AGM. 2% is actually a very low threashold, and lowering the bar further >risks launching a DDoS on the AGM, which we don't need. The primary means >of influencing the direction of the association as a member is through >the elections to the RIPE NCC board. Not through launching agenda items >on to the AGM agenda. > >Keep as is! > >Best regards, > >- kurtis - > >--- >Kurt Erik Lindqvist, CEO >kurtis at netnod.se, Direct: +46-8-562 860 11, Switch: +46-8-562 860 00 >Franzéngatan 5 | SE-112 51 Stockholm | Sweden > > > > > > > >---- >If you don't want to receive emails from the RIPE NCC members-discuss >mailing list, please log in to your LIR Portal account and go to the >general page: >https://lirportal.ripe.net/general/view > >Click on "Edit my LIR details", under "Subscribed Mailing Lists". From >here, you can add or remove addresses.
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] amendment proposal for the Article ofassociation
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] amendment proposal for the Article of association
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]