This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[members-discuss] Interesting IP count
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [tech] Interesting IP count
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Interesting IP count
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Stefan Neufeind
neufeind at gmx.de
Tue Jun 5 08:37:06 CEST 2012
On 06/05/2012 01:30 AM, Lu Heng wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 1:19 AM, Job Snijders <job at instituut.net> wrote: >> >> On 5 jun. 2012, at 01:03, Lu Heng wrote: [...] >>> NAT has limited functionality, yes, but for most cable network users, >>> that functionality is enough for them. >> >> Might be true, but I like a world where everybody can run any service >> on their IP addresses without jumping through NAT hoops. > > We are jumping though NAT hoops already these days, look at Chinese > market, the largest internet user base, they are living an happy life > with their carrier NAT for years. Well, they are living behind a big firewall anyway. So if we as non-Chinese worry about them doing NAT, maybe that should worry us more. Regards, Stefan
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [tech] Interesting IP count
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Interesting IP count
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]