[members-discuss] Interesting IP count
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [tech] Interesting IP count
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Interesting IP count
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Stefan Neufeind
neufeind at gmx.de
Tue Jun 5 08:37:06 CEST 2012
On 06/05/2012 01:30 AM, Lu Heng wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 1:19 AM, Job Snijders <job at instituut.net> wrote: >> >> On 5 jun. 2012, at 01:03, Lu Heng wrote: [...] >>> NAT has limited functionality, yes, but for most cable network users, >>> that functionality is enough for them. >> >> Might be true, but I like a world where everybody can run any service >> on their IP addresses without jumping through NAT hoops. > > We are jumping though NAT hoops already these days, look at Chinese > market, the largest internet user base, they are living an happy life > with their carrier NAT for years. Well, they are living behind a big firewall anyway. So if we as non-Chinese worry about them doing NAT, maybe that should worry us more. Regards, Stefan
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [tech] Interesting IP count
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Interesting IP count
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]