[members-discuss] Interesting IP count
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Interesting IP count
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Interesting IP count
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Job Snijders
job at instituut.net
Tue Jun 5 01:19:07 CEST 2012
Hi Lu Heng, On 5 jun. 2012, at 01:03, Lu Heng wrote: > Second I want to make perfect clear that I have no doubts about how > serious IPv6 is, and how urgent we need to do it. :-) > But Job you are perfectly right, this topic most of us has come over > multiple times, and I am sorry to bring this up again. No, do not feel sorry, IP economics change over time. Especially given that World IPv6 Laundry day is around the corner, it's worth discussing. > As I have been to Asian a lot, which is the first region out of IP > spaces, but I find out most of my Chinese colleagues have never > worried about IP issues. > Even China telecom are charging over 10USD/month/IP, most ISP are just > ok with it. > because end of the day, 10USD/month isn't a lot for enterprise customer. You are talking about _today_ I assume. I think at some point the cost of maintaining IPv4 space will be higher than just deploying IPv6 on the devices that talk to other continents. > NAT has limited functionality, yes, but for most cable network users, > that functionality is enough for them. Might be true, but I like a world where everybody can run any service on their IP addresses without jumping through NAT hoops. Kind regards, Job -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 4867 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20120605/3dc1a534/attachment.p7s>
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Interesting IP count
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Interesting IP count
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]