This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] Next RIPE members GM, in A'dam
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Next RIPE members GM, in A'dam
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Next RIPE members GM, in A'dam
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nick Hilliard
nick at netability.ie
Thu Jul 26 19:58:32 CEST 2012
On 19/07/2012 19:24, Hank Nussbacher wrote: > Almost all legacy IP holders will agree with the above statement. We are > not against paying our fair share. But how about a discussion? Listen to > the different sides of the debate and then make a decision, rather than > make unilateral decisions. The legacy resource holders have had 10 years to put forward some policies about this - the ERX project was completed in 2002. On the other hand, the NCC's action was surprising, to say the least. I'm having a hard time trying to convince myself that this isn't a policy issue and that the NCC was actually entitled to do what they did without community consultation. Nick
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Next RIPE members GM, in A'dam
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Next RIPE members GM, in A'dam
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]