This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] Charging scheme discussion
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Charging scheme discussion
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Charging scheme discussion
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Thomas Mangin
thomas.mangin at exa-networks.co.uk
Wed Jul 25 13:03:29 CEST 2012
> They can continue operating their network without submitting to RIPE NCC authority, without paying their RIPE NCC bills and without coordination and registration services provided by RIPE NCC. This can lead to split of the Internet or to dissolution of RIPE NCC and it could cause considerable operational problems. Good point and unfortunately is an argument for signing the RIPE records - I do not like this idea much ... Thomas -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20120725/c18c710e/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Charging scheme discussion
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Charging scheme discussion
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]