This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] Next RIPE members GM, in A'dam
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Next RIPE members GM, in A'dam
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Next RIPE members GM, in A'dam
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nick Hilliard
nick at netability.ie
Thu Jul 19 19:34:37 CEST 2012
On 18/07/2012 22:23, Brandon Butterworth wrote: > What's the proposal? We have legacy and are happy with it just > as it is. Actually I don't see why anyone needs to fiddle with > v4 stuff I got the impression that most legacy holders were happy because they got continued registry services at no cost to themselves. The RIPE NCC appears to have taken the position that as registry services cost money to handle, it would not be unfair to expect that they get some level of compensation from legacy holders: http://www.ripe.net/lir-services/resource-management/legacy-space Nick
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Next RIPE members GM, in A'dam
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Next RIPE members GM, in A'dam
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]