This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[members-discuss] A summary for Proposal for New RIPE NCCCharging Scheme Model
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] A summary for Proposal for New RIPE NCCCharging Scheme Model
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] A summary for Proposal for New RIPE NCCCharging Scheme Model
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hank Nussbacher
hank at efes.iucc.ac.il
Wed Jul 18 19:24:19 CEST 2012
At 16:08 18/07/2012 +0200, LIR wrote: >Being a pioneer, you had very low prices for twenty years, and you could >build a market using almost for free public resources. Building a market? You might very well find that a vast majority of the legacy IP holders are mainly academic organizations that were the Internet pioneers. These are non-profit organizations, who helped and assisted local organizations start using the Internet in their respective countries. >Now that resources are limited rules must change. We are not against change. We are willing to pay our fair share. We are against unilateral decisions, without discussion. -Hank >Thanks to Internet pioneers, but you should also thank the community for >giving them resources at very special conditions until now! > >Regards, > >Tonino
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] A summary for Proposal for New RIPE NCCCharging Scheme Model
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] A summary for Proposal for New RIPE NCCCharging Scheme Model
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]