[members-discuss] A summary for Proposal for New RIPE NCCCharging Scheme Model
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] A summary for Proposal for New RIPE NCCCharging Scheme Model
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] A summary for Proposal for New RIPE NCCCharging Scheme Model
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sascha Luck
lists-ripe at c4inet.net
Wed Jul 18 16:15:18 CEST 2012
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 04:08:50PM +0200, LIR wrote: >Oh! Only my contracts change price with time, I see... even ICANN asks >more money for domains, and electrical power costs more, and bandwith >changes prices, and salaries change... >Only first RIPE members must have same price than twenty years ago! This isn't a market. The NCC is in a regional monopoly position and any attempt to charge "whatever the traffic will bear" on the resources it administrates would (and should) be met with a challenge via the national and EU competition authorities. That would be a can of worms that I'm not sure anyone wants to open. rgds, Sascha Luck
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] A summary for Proposal for New RIPE NCCCharging Scheme Model
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] A summary for Proposal for New RIPE NCCCharging Scheme Model
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]