This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[members-discuss] A summary for Proposal for New RIPE NCCCharging Scheme Model
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] A summary for Proposal for New RIPE NCCCharging Scheme Model
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] A summary for Proposal for New RIPE NCCCharging Scheme Model
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sascha Luck
lists-ripe at c4inet.net
Wed Jul 18 16:15:18 CEST 2012
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 04:08:50PM +0200, LIR wrote: >Oh! Only my contracts change price with time, I see... even ICANN asks >more money for domains, and electrical power costs more, and bandwith >changes prices, and salaries change... >Only first RIPE members must have same price than twenty years ago! This isn't a market. The NCC is in a regional monopoly position and any attempt to charge "whatever the traffic will bear" on the resources it administrates would (and should) be met with a challenge via the national and EU competition authorities. That would be a can of worms that I'm not sure anyone wants to open. rgds, Sascha Luck
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] A summary for Proposal for New RIPE NCCCharging Scheme Model
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] A summary for Proposal for New RIPE NCCCharging Scheme Model
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]