This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[members-discuss] Proposal for New RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Proposal for New RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Proposal for New RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nick Hilliard
nick at netability.ie
Wed Jul 18 13:32:31 CEST 2012
On 17/07/2012 12:00, Raymond Jetten wrote: > Now alloversudden, when it becomes clear (again realy old news) that v4 > runs out some day, there is anger, jealousy, and bitterness, maybe even > fear, since "the big old guys have many ip:s, lets make them pay for it, or > they should return them..." Not sure where this position comes from. From where I sit, I get the impression that members understand that running the RIPE NCC costs money and that his money needs to be collected from the membership. Other than that as far as I can tell, most people generally seem to agree with the conclusions of the Charging Scheme Task Force. Nick
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Proposal for New RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Proposal for New RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]