This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[members-discuss] A summary for Proposal for New RIPE NCCCharging Scheme Model
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] A summary for Proposal for New RIPE NCCCharging Scheme Model
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] A summary for Proposal for New RIPE NCCCharging Scheme Model
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Paolo Di Francesco
paolo.difrancesco at level7.it
Tue Jul 17 17:27:23 CEST 2012
Hi Gert > Hi, > > On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 05:12:27PM +0200, Paolo Di Francesco wrote: >> well I think that IPv4 address space percentage allocation will not >> change in the next 5 years > > True, but that's not related to the cost of the RIPE NCC anymore, so > why should it be relevant to the costs paid? > well because it should be relevant to the "size" of the LIR and not saying that we should NOT consider also incentives or other metrics in the same equation. the other option to not make the fee "flat rate" (which I personally do not like because it's simply a barrier) is to ask how much revenues are coming from the IP services, which is not so pratical -- Ing. Paolo Di Francesco Level7 s.r.l. unipersonale Sede operativa: Largo Montalto, 5 - 90144 Palermo C.F. e P.IVA 05940050825 Fax : +39-091-8772072 assistenza: (+39) 091-8776432 web: http://www.level7.it
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] A summary for Proposal for New RIPE NCCCharging Scheme Model
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] A summary for Proposal for New RIPE NCCCharging Scheme Model
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]