This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[members-discuss] [Ticket#2012071701001001] Proposal for New RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [Ticket#2012071701001001] Proposal for New RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [Ticket#2012071701001001] Proposal for New RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Paolo Di Francesco
paolo.difrancesco at level7.it
Tue Jul 17 16:07:01 CEST 2012
Dear All > Dear Tomas, > > > I do not understand why you want to tax IP address consumption > through charging scheme. It should be two different things. > > They depend on each other. If we change charging scheme and payment will > depend from count of IPs then RIPE can't be non profit organisation. > > On the other hand, I can't understund why RIPE charges per PI/AS right > now? In my opinion this is risky way for non profit organisation too. > I never said that we should "tax" IPs only that it is a parameter to LIR size, together with other parameters. The point is that, I am still wondering why big LIR are paying such a low amount of money (in percentage compared to revenues) Regards > -- > Alexey Ivanov > LeaderTelecom Ltd. > > 17.07.2012 12:38 - Tomas Hlavacek написал(а): > Hello! > Well RIPE NCC is managing IP address pool because community submits to > the authority RIPE NCC has. And the authority has been voluntarily > transferred to the NCC by the community itself and it is executed by the > community in fact. But if there is a considerable amount of people that > disagree with actions taken by RIPE NCC or RIPE as whole what prevents > them to pick a random resource and announce it to DFZ? > This is the point where all the analogies with water or air fails. Only > governments are crazy enough and have enough power to tax air for > breathing and rain water. They can eventually tax IP addresses as well. > But RIPE NCC can not do that. > I do not understand why you want to tax IP address consumption through > charging scheme. It should be two different things. > Tomas > > On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 10:45 PM, LIR <lir at lanto.it > <mailto:lir at lanto.it>> wrote: > RIPE is managing a public resource, and usage should be fair and > available to all. > > Who is using a lot of a resources which are rare and exausted should pay > accordingly, as he/she is using a public resource and others are denied > this usage because of him. So the community should have a gain from this > concession. > > So, very simply, IPs are like water, air: a PUBLIC resource!!!!! > -- > Tomáš Hlaváček > ------------------------------------------------- > IGNUM s.r.o. | Vinohradská 190 | Praha 3 | 130 61 > > > ---- > If you don't want to receive emails from the RIPE NCC members-discuss > mailing list, please log in to your LIR Portal account and go to the general page: > https://lirportal.ripe.net/general/view > > Click on "Edit my LIR details", under "Subscribed Mailing Lists". From here, you can add or remove addresses. > -- Ing. Paolo Di Francesco Level7 s.r.l. unipersonale Sede operativa: Largo Montalto, 5 - 90144 Palermo C.F. e P.IVA 05940050825 Fax : +39-091-8772072 assistenza: (+39) 091-8776432 web: http://www.level7.it
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [Ticket#2012071701001001] Proposal for New RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [Ticket#2012071701001001] Proposal for New RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]