[members-discuss] [Ticket#2012071501000382] A summary for Proposal for New RIPENCC Charging Scheme Model
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [Ticket#2012071501000382] A summary for Proposal for New RIPENCC Charging Scheme Model
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] A summary for Proposal for New RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Dimitri I Sidelnikov
sid at free.net
Mon Jul 16 02:47:17 CEST 2012
On 15.07.2012 21:20, LeaderTelecom Ltd. wrote: > > IPs not "good". Why not sell IPs as services? Just because an IP number itself is NOT a service. It is an exhaustible resource. Service can't be exhaustible. But (re)allocating/(re)assigning global Internet resources is a service. Even if all resources were exhausted, the service would survive as long as the resources were used.;-) I absolutely agree with Tomas, that > RIPE NCC is (and should be) here to hand out resources and register them. and we are paying RIPE NCC for the service. Regards, D.Sidelnikov -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20120716/01489e95/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [Ticket#2012071501000382] A summary for Proposal for New RIPENCC Charging Scheme Model
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] A summary for Proposal for New RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]