This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] [Ticket#2012071501000382] A summary for Proposal for New RIPENCC Charging Scheme Model
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [Ticket#2012071501000382] A summary for Proposal for New RIPENCC Charging Scheme Model
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] A summary for Proposal for New RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Dimitri I Sidelnikov
sid at free.net
Mon Jul 16 02:47:17 CEST 2012
On 15.07.2012 21:20, LeaderTelecom Ltd. wrote: > > IPs not "good". Why not sell IPs as services? Just because an IP number itself is NOT a service. It is an exhaustible resource. Service can't be exhaustible. But (re)allocating/(re)assigning global Internet resources is a service. Even if all resources were exhausted, the service would survive as long as the resources were used.;-) I absolutely agree with Tomas, that > RIPE NCC is (and should be) here to hand out resources and register them. and we are paying RIPE NCC for the service. Regards, D.Sidelnikov -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20120716/01489e95/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [Ticket#2012071501000382] A summary for Proposal for New RIPENCC Charging Scheme Model
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] A summary for Proposal for New RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]