This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] [Ticket#2012071401000802] "classful" charging scheme that still charges for resources
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] "classful" charging scheme that still charges for resources
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Next RIPE members GM, in A'dam
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
LeaderTelecom Ltd.
info at leadertelecom.ru
Sat Jul 14 17:18:16 CEST 2012
> Has a schema like this ever been considered or voted upon ? No. While in this case could of small LIRs can increase rapidly. Each LIR has for now free trainings and etc. So price for small LIRs for each IP should be higher. For big LIRs - smaller. -- Alexey Ivanov LeaderTelecom Ltd. 14.07.2012 18:45 - Andrea Cocito написал(а): Hello all, after all the discussions I cannot understand what the problem would be with a scheme like the following: a) Member LIRs are divided into 16 categories, named /5, /6, /7, .. / 20, /21 b) Your category is the smallest route that could contain the total IPv4 allocated space of your LIR c) Your fee in euro is T/2^C, where C is your category and T the total RIPENCC costs. Seems simple and fair, it is still a category based model and thus it does not change the tax status of RIPE, and in example: - Up to 2048 IP addresses you are class /21 and pay about 100 euro - Up to 4096 IP addresses you are class /20 and pay about 200 euro - Up to 8192 IP addresses you are class /19 and pay about 400 euro - Up to 16384 IP addresses you are class /18 and pay about 800 euro - Up to 32768 IP addresses you are class /17 and pay about 1600 euro - Up to 65535 IP addresses you are class /16 and pay about 3200 euro ... and so on. Some corrections improvements might be considered to take in other exhaustable resources (IPv6 address space, ASn) and even to some extent non-exhaustable ones (number of tickets per year, number of records or operations in the database). Has a schema like this ever been considered or voted upon ? Regards, A. ---- If you don't want to receive emails from the RIPE NCC members-discuss mailing list, please log in to your LIR Portal account and go to the general page: [1]https://lirportal.ripe.net/general/view Click on "Edit my LIR details", under "Subscribed Mailing Lists". From here, you can add or remove addresses. [1] https://lirportal.ripe.net/general/view -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20120714/f4e675dc/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] "classful" charging scheme that still charges for resources
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Next RIPE members GM, in A'dam
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]