This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] Proposal for New RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Proposal for New RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Proposal for New RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
LIR
lir at lanto.it
Sat Jul 14 14:29:40 CEST 2012
For IPv6, quantity could not be a problem, but for IPv4 the addresses are the valued resource, and as such must be paid. Regards, Tonino Il 14/07/2012 14:21, Peter Knapp ha scritto: > " More allocated addresses doesn't automatically mean more requests, and more load on RIPE NCC." > > It should do if you are correctly registering your allocations... End > > Sent using BlackBerry® from CCS Leeds Ltd > > -----Original Message----- > From: LIR <lir at lanto.it> > Sender: <members-discuss-bounces at ripe.net> > Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2012 14:23:12 > To: <members-discuss at ripe.net> > Subject: Re: [members-discuss] Proposal for New RIPE NCC Charging Scheme > Model > > When you buy water, you pay per liter, not for the number of invoices > you have. > > If you buy 10.000 liters, you pay 10.000 liters, indipendently if they > are charged in one invoice or 100 invoices. > > Regards, > > Tonino > > Il 14/07/2012 02:05, Dimitri I Sidelnikov ha scritto: >> On 14.07.2012 02:46, LIR wrote: >>> So, let's charge per resource usage ... >> AFAIK, RIPE NCC is NOT a merchant of numbering resources. It is not >> selling goods, but rather provides a service to community. If we were to >> charge "per usage", then the annual number of humanly processed tickets >> should be taken for qualifying LIRs. >> >> More allocated addresses doesn't automatically mean more requests, and >> more load on RIPE NCC. There might be LIRs with rather large address >> space allocated, which nevertheless send only few requests, which needed >> human processing. >> Why such LIR should pay more than a LIR sending a lot of >> requests/applications every day? >> >> >> Regards, >> D.Sidelnikov >> >> >> >> ---- >> If you don't want to receive emails from the RIPE NCC members-discuss >> mailing list, please log in to your LIR Portal account and go to the general page: >> https://lirportal.ripe.net/general/view >> >> Click on "Edit my LIR details", under "Subscribed Mailing Lists". From here, you can add or remove addresses. >> > > > ---- > If you don't want to receive emails from the RIPE NCC members-discuss > mailing list, please log in to your LIR Portal account and go to the general page: > https://lirportal.ripe.net/general/view > > Click on "Edit my LIR details", under "Subscribed Mailing Lists". From here, you can add or remove addresses. >
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Proposal for New RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Proposal for New RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]