This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] is the self-assessment model really a good idea?
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] is the self-assessment model really a good idea?
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] is the self-assessment model really a good idea?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Thomas Jacob
ripe-ncc-members-list at internet24.de
Tue Jul 10 14:47:30 CEST 2012
On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 13:34 +0100, Jamie Stallwood wrote: > A flat fee would disadvantage small members even more as the "regular" > fee would apply. Perfectly agree, yet wouldn't this be exactly the situation we will end up with, if LIRs take would start self-assessing themselves into the small band in larger numbers? And what's to stop them from doing that?
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] is the self-assessment model really a good idea?
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] is the self-assessment model really a good idea?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]